Monitoring U.S. citizens' phone conversations to detect potential Essay - 1

Monitoring U.S. citizens forebode conversations to detect potential terriorist threats - Essay ExampleThe real spirit of American political life and popular lookouts simply do not allow the allege to extend its sway beyond a point where it not only interferes with the personal and professional lives of race and individuals, but rather tempers with the privacy of their private and professional phone conversations. National security is really real important. However, the concerns for national security cannot be allowed to irrationality expand to a level where they start hampering the normal coifivities of the citizens.The act of monitoring the phone conversations of citizens is also unconstitutional and violates the Fourth Amendment rights of the citizens, which constitute a part of the Bill of Rights (Dripps, 2007). superficially speaking, the Fourth Amendment to the constitution of the United States of America intends to protect the citizens from illegal search and seizures. S urprisingly, the very purpose of this Amendment was to check-out procedure the abuse of general search warrants in the American Revolution (Dripps, 2007). In the historical Katz v. United States judgment, the US Supreme Court declared any state intrusion into an area where a citizen has the reasonable expectation and right to seek privacy, to be an illegal search and a violation of the Fourth Amendment (Dripps, 2007). Thus, monitoring of the phone conversations of the US citizens is a legal and ethical violation of their privacy.This in no way means that the practice of law enforcement agencies simply cannot have an access to the phone conversations of the people doubted of having terrorist links. They can do so as per the slipway and procedures laid down by the US laws. As per the Fourth Amendment, the law enforcement personnel can resort hotel to a legal search (here monitoring of phone conversations), provided such a procedure is pursuant to a valid court warrant sanctioned on the basis of the information provided by a law enforcement personnel to the court, under an oath