Racism in America Essay

ReconstructionBy9/9/20131. Columbian historian Eric F iodinr (1983) quotes W. E. B. Dubois in calling reconstruction a splendid nonstarter (p.16). After studying the events of late 19th century, throw whether or non you agree with his position. What are the semipermanent implications? In my persuasion the one of the largest mis practise ups that was made was the step of racism that appease continued in America. calm to this day in that respect is a large meter of racism in America, the only difference is it is non just between white and minaciouss. When it comes to racism for well-nigh reason it seems all break pasts and all passel posteriort just issue forth along. Growing up in the south I select seen this outset hand. The problem is now if there is any kinds of dissonance between plys it is blown way out of proportion. A small example would be the Travon Martin case. This case should of not had half of the publicity it did, but because it was a criminal offen se that was white on black people took it as a hate crime. The problem in my persuasion is it was not even white on black and half of America still seems to telephone it was. When people get something in there heads they are overtaking to put their own twist on what they think happened and it will cause things to get out of hand.I believe the Emancipation Proclamation was intended to be the right step in fixing a problem. The problem still existed because even when it comes to law officials there is racism to this day. I have seen police officers that trade people that are not the same race as them differently because that is the way they were raised. That to me is something that is unacceptable, if you are a police officer or a individual in a similar position and they still are using race to make decisions it creates more than problems in the first gear place. On the other cheek some people attempt to use their race to benefit themselves because they are a minority. I went to educate with a young African American that was dissolveed on because of the color of his skin, he was new to our school and was travel into our school because his school was fill when a hurricane came and flooded his school.Some scholars saw a bump to pick on someone because they were different, they talk, look, and act different than others. I saw this happening and became friends with him because I do not believe in this at all. Another studentthat came in wanted to play sports and thought he was the best player on the field. He did not make the team and he filed a disorder with the state of North Carolina saying the reason he did not make the team was because of his race. He was indeed transferred from our school to be take containn a chance to play somewhere else. To me this was someone trying to take advantage of their race in a prejudicious way simply because the student did not get his way to beget with. 4. Identify one hearty leader in the Populist movement an d give a brief synopsis of this persons contributions, failures, and successes in bringing about the ideas of populismIn 1890 Populists won control of the Kansas state legislature, and Kansan William Peffer became the societys first U.S. Senator. Peffer, with his long white beard, was a humorous frame of reference to many Eastern journalists and politicians, who saw little license of Populism in their states and often treated the company as a joke (1890, 2000). Western and Southern Populists gained a large amount of support even though the other parties felt this way. Populists presidential candidate, James B. weaver actually was able to win over one million votes. Because of fraud, intimidation, and violence by the Southern Democrats the fellowship still failed to make any further gains. one(a) of the largest pieces of success was the party being officially founded because of the merger of the Farmers Alliance and the Knights of Labor. Because of all the negative things goin g on because of the Democrat and Republicans all going against the Populist party it made it very hard to continue this party and keep it functioning. Two main juntos had appeared. One, the fusion Populists, desire to merge with the Democrats, using the threat of independent face to force changes in the major partys platform.The Populist organization in Kansas had already fusedover the bitter protest of those who considered this a sell-out. Fusionists argued that the regionally based third party could never taste guinea pig power the best strategy was to work a major party that could (1890, 2000). The Second faction was called mid-roaders and suspected that Democratic leaders wanted to bring down the third-party threat. The Populists party also wanted to schedule the national convention before the Republican and Democrats were able to hold theirs. This would be a fight that was lost and they would have to hold their meeting after themajor-party meetings. In my opinion the la rger parties where using their size and power to make it very difficult for the Populists party to stay in tact and eventually got what they wanted when it was done away with. The Populists began serving more as a token for the Republicans and their nomination that the Populists put through would even begin to ignore the party even though they were the ones who propose him.Reference1890. (2000). Retrieved from http//projects.vassar.edu/1896/populists.html